[Larrabee]

What you mean? Your CPU overheats? He can run windows and firefox or IE but not windows and the screen capture tool? Firefox is 3 times heavier then screen capture...

[ChrisTheFeral]

Originally Posted by Larrabee

What you mean? Your CPU overheats? He can run windows and firefox or IE but not windows and the screen capture tool? Firefox is 3 times heavier then screen capture...

Yes, but my graphics card isn't strong enough, that's why it takes me 50 minutes to render a 640 x 480 at 15fps h.264 .mov 10 mins in length.

[Larrabee]

Recording isn't that heavy, I guess. Even if you have an onboard graphics card that is some years old.

[Shan Gee]

Originally Posted by Larrabee

Snagit is not free.

Seems like the screen capture tool is realy a good one. It's free and seems to have some interesting features.
What about the screen quality?


This is off-topic?

You're right SnagIt isn't free. In my reply to jazboy, I did say that you can try a trial version and purchase it for $40 if you like it.

The screen quality is great! Try it for yourself and see.

[sharkhead7854]

Originally Posted by Larrabee

What you mean? Your CPU overheats? He can run windows and firefox or IE but not windows and the screen capture tool? Firefox is 3 times heavier then screen capture...

that depends what your using,
i know that just loading a program like snagit lags down my computer more than anything else!

[SkyFuser]

Snagit is actually pretty memory intensive. I just either use the standard PrtScrn and do editing in Paint.NET. There's also a built-in screen capture in XnView, and I heard that Gadwin Printscreen is pretty good.

[metsamees]

i don't remember but i think i used to use xnview, like 6 months ago but i had a HD crash in middle of it and forgot about and i was okay with Xnview, worked great for me